Remove Liquidity on BNB Chain

Connect whatever wallet owns it and the position is located for you across PancakeSwap and Uniswap. Choose a percentage from 1 to 100, check the payout, and sign. Concentrated positions need more than one protocol call before anything reaches you, and all of them travel together here.

On this chain the most common cause by a distance is the token itself rather than the pool. A token that taxes transfers hands the pool less than the contract expected, so the withdrawal reverts every time until the tolerance is raised above the tax rate. Tokens with a maximum transaction size are the same problem wearing different clothes: the position has to come out across several smaller attempts instead of one. Both are far more prevalent on BNB Chain than elsewhere, and the long-standing forum threads about withdrawals failing here are overwhelmingly about one or the other. A paused token blocks the payout outright until it unpauses, and a token whose transfers cannot be made to work at all was never going to release the liquidity.

No. A failed withdrawal changes nothing except the gas it consumed, and the position sits exactly where it was. That is worth saying plainly because the failure looks alarming and the search results for it are full of people offering to help for a fee. Raising the tolerance, reducing the amount, or waiting for a paused token to reopen are the actual remedies, and all of them are things you do yourself.

Both, and on v2 pairs as well as v3 positions on either. PancakeSwap is the larger venue on BNB Chain by some way and Uniswap also runs here, so the tool reads PancakeSwap and Uniswap positions from the same page and you do not need to know in advance which one holds your position.

A v2 pair gives you fungible LP tokens representing a share of the whole liquidity pool, and they burn in proportion when you withdraw. A v3 position is concentrated liquidity in an NFT covering a specific price range, earning trading fees only from swaps that cross it, and nothing burns proportionally: the position's liquidity is reduced instead. This matters because reading the v2 behaviour as though it applies to everything will mislead anyone holding a concentrated position.

Yes, together in one transaction. The protocol does not do this on its own, though: a concentrated position treats the reduction and the payout as separate calls, and stopping after the first records a debt in your favour without transferring anything at all. Both are always sent here.

Anything between 1% and 99% keeps it open on the bounds you originally chose, earning against the remainder. Repeating that costs nothing beyond gas.

Burned, once it is empty, which frees up the storage and retires the identifier for good. Both exchanges hand the emptied NFT back to you through their own interfaces instead, so this departs from what you may be used to. Where those bounds might be wanted again, taking 99% leaves the position intact for a later deposit.

Price ran past one of your bounds, so the pool had already traded the position down to a single asset before you withdrew anything. Whichever one arrived tells you the direction it went. Fees are counted separately from principal and frequently arrive in both tokens even when the principal does not, though a position whose fees were collected earlier will have none left to pay.

Real BNB. Pools hold the wrapped form, so a withdrawal returns WBNB until something converts it, and that conversion runs inside the same transaction rather than leaving you to do it afterwards.

0.01 BNB plus gas, shown on this page and again in the review before you sign. That one fee covers reaching a concentrated PancakeSwap or Uniswap position you already own and handling both exchanges from one page, with no cut of the BNB or tokens you withdraw.

Neither, and both are functioning as designed. A locker releases on its own schedule and not before, which its contract will confirm. Burned LP went to an address nobody holds the keys to, so that liquidity stays in the pool permanently. Offers to reverse either for a payment are describing something the contracts do not allow.